1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuri [45]
3 years ago
13

Why was the indian removal act considered to be controvesial?

History
1 answer:
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
3 0
The Indian Removal Act took place in the first half of the 1800s under the presidencies of Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren and directly led to the Trail of Tears, which resulted in the death of many members of tribes in the American South. It was considered controversial because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tribes' cause wherein the state of Georgia (which was actively seeking to evict the Indian inhabitants) was told it had no right to force their removal. Nevertheless, the president ordered their removal.

hope this helps! :)
You might be interested in
Please help asap! I will give a person the brainliest crown! Inappropriate comment will get report.
Minchanka [31]

Answer:

Yes they can If the government has a compelling interest it is seeking to protect, and the fundamental right the government seeks to restrict is fairly and narrowly regulated by the law in question, the restrictive law may be upheld by the courts.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Federalists were also called?
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

Patriots

Explanation:

Federalists are people who supported the constitution. They were also called Patriots.

8 0
3 years ago
The Bill of Rights affirmatively states some rights that the people are guaranteed
denis-greek [22]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How was the loss at vicksburg harmful to the confederacy?
Taya2010 [7]
Vicksburg was the last stronghold until the Union could have the Mississippi River. If they were to take Vicksburg, they would split the Confederacy and go along with their Anaconda Plan. They did so by starving Vicksburg to surrender.
5 0
3 years ago
Why are pandemics more dangerous to developing nations?
notsponge [240]
Because a pandemic(unlike and epidemic, which is more provincial) reaches around an entire nation and/or continent. Obviously, a nationwide sickness would be terrible for a newly developing nation trying to get on its feet for the first time. It’s just more unnecessary work for the new nation to deal with. Hope this helps!
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The hallmark of the revolution in which country was the establishment of islamic law (sharia) as the law of the land?
    11·1 answer
  • The Roman Catholic Church responded to the spread of Protestantism in the sixteenth century in several ways. Three of those resp
    12·1 answer
  • All were reasons for workers to form Unions in the 1800s except: *
    14·1 answer
  • What finally persuaded U.S. President Harry Truman to use the atomic bomb on Japan? It seemed that the Japanese would never surr
    14·2 answers
  • In the three centuries after Columbus’ voyages, most of the people who came to the Western Hemisphere originated in which of the
    14·2 answers
  • Describe Eisenhower's stance on the Cold War.
    7·1 answer
  • Thomas Nast was a muckraker following William Marcy “Boss” Tweed, a powerful New York City politician. What were muckrakers duri
    11·1 answer
  • Hi anyone who has taken the us government or politics and has taken the end of course exam. Was it easy?
    5·1 answer
  • How many witches were burned at the stake in the salem witch trials?
    13·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!