The primary purpose of the Hawley-Smoot Tariff of 1930 was to raise tariffs on imports to the United States in an effort to protect domestic jobs. It was widely seen as a failure, however.
The Great Compromise settled the debate over the Virginia and New Jersey Plans by ensuring that <em>B. Each state would have the same number ...</em>
- The Great Compromise provided for bicameral Congress. The House of Representatives is where states are represented based on population. The Senate is where representation is based on the equality of states (2 members from each state).
- The Great Compromise was not reached based on the same number of senators and representatives without regard to state population. It was not reached based on equal number of representatives while the number of senators is based on state population
- The Great Compromise was not reached based on having the number of senators and representatives determined on state population.
Thus, the Great Compromise reached in Connecticut allayed the fears of states with smaller populations by recognizing equal representation in the Senate. It also gave states with larger populations higher representatives in the House of Representatives.
Learn more about the Great Compromise at brainly.com/question/19586578
Whether judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's original ruling
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Normally the cases that come to Supreme Court are the ones that had been appealed for justice to review case from lower courts. The Supreme Court does not take any case just like that it takes up the case only if there is any breach in the federal law or any issue that is involving state laws.
Before heard by the Supreme Court it asks for details to be submitted with evidence by the trial court. Cases which involves national attention and needs a trial will be taken by the Supreme Court. If the case was influenced by judicial activism it is appeal-able to the Supreme Court. The Supreme court then resolves this case.
