Answer:
Los derechos no son absolutos porque pueden cambiar con el tiempo. En los Estados Unidos, los derechos más cercanos a ser absolutos están contenidos en la Declaración de Derechos. La Declaración de Derechos tenía la intención de otorgar a los ciudadanos de este país derechos que el gobierno no podía cambiar sin el consentimiento directo de la gente.
Explanation:
Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.
We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.
Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.
Answer:
Provides a system of checks and balances between the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches, where the powers of each branch are limited by the others.
Explanation:
The constitution frames the ideal of separation of powers as crucial for limiting any hegemonic power that might prevail. During the debates that framed the US constitution, James Madison argued that sectoral interests should be protected against the coercion of any majority, which led to the drafting of a constitution that protected individual liberties from the coercion of the majority. Thus the constitution states that the executive branch, who can appoint judges and veto laws, should be limited by the legislative branch, in charge of enacting laws, and the judicial branch, in charge of interpreting and applying the law.
