1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
levacccp [35]
3 years ago
10

You are taking an exam and you haven’t studied for it. Your teacher isn’t looking, so you could cheat and probably not get caugh

t. You know that if you do the honest thing, you might not do too well, but if you cheat, you’ll get a better grade.
1 What do you do?


2 Explain your reasoning.
Law
2 answers:
TEA [102]3 years ago
4 0

Do the right thing and don't cheat i wouldnt because there is always that on chance you could get caught

Naya [18.7K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Factorise I am not sure if you are follow me please please f

You might be interested in
While reviewing a set of fingerprints, the law enforcement database identified a ridge characteristic in which one ridge formed
Burka [1]

Answer:

A.

specialty

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
People become trapped in an abusive relationship for many reasons.
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

scared to leave, children in home, and money

4 0
2 years ago
Ya diggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
arlik [135]

Answer:

yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa bruh

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following cases established testimony by expert witness?
Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

Explanation:

Judge is the gatekeeper

The judge is to decide whether the expert is qualified to deliver reliable testimony and whether the expert's report is sufficiently reliable to be helpful to the Trier of Fact.

Rule 702 Testimony by Experts

1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data

2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods.

The Supreme Court identified four tests that can be used by the gatekeeper-judge to determine whether to admit the expert testimony. It is typically understood that it is not necessary for the expert testimony to pass all four tests.

1) Tested - Whether the theory or technique used by the expert can be, and has been, tested

2) Peer Review - Whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication

3) Error Rate - The known or potential rate of error of the method used is known or predictable

4) General Acceptance - The degree of the method's or conclusion's acceptance within the relevant scientific community

Review of five court cases

1) Frye v. United States - 1923 - established the "general acceptance" principle

2) Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 702 - 1975 - established the rule for "scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge" expert witness testimony

3) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - 1993 - established the four-part Daubert test for evaluating expert testimony

4) GE v. Joiner - 1997 - confirmed the trial judge's gatekeeper role

5) Kumho Tire v. Carmichael - 1999 - expanded the Daubert tests to apply to all disciplines

United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land

A good example of the application of the Daubert Test.

This is a rare case where the appellate court overruled the trial judge's gatekeeper role.

Gatekeeper is not intended to serve as a replacement for the adversary system: Vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence.

Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding. In other words, the purpose is to make the process more efficient.

The report must contain:

(i) a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them;

(ii) the data or other information considered by the witness in forming them;

(iii) any exhibits that will be used to summarize or support them;

(iv) the witness's qualifications, including a list of all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

(v) a list of all other cases in which, during the previous 4 years, the witness testified as an expert at trial or by deposition; and

(vi) a statement of the compensation to be paid for the study and testimony in the case.

That written report must contain, at a minimum, six items:

1) All opinions the witness will express and their foundation and reasoning;

2) Data and information considered by the witness;

3) Any exhibits that will be used while giving the testimony in court;

4) Witness qualifications, including all publications authored in the previous 10 years;

5) List of all other cases in the last four years where testimony was given as an expert at trial or deposition;

6) Description of the compensation for the study and testimony.

An appraisal report may need to be quite detailed. This may be at odds with the request of retaining counsel, who may want a less detailed report.

Report should include any exhibits which the witness anticipates using as "demonstrative evidence" during testimony.

report should include a statement of publications and testimony for the prescribed periods.

Some items of interest in this Rule are:

1 - If an objection is raised by one of the attorneys, the deponent will still be required to provide an answer, but that answer will be subject to approval by the court after hearing the objection.

2 - The deponent may refuse to answer a question only when it is necessary to preserve a privilege, enforce a limitation directly by the court, or present a motion under Rule 30(d)(4).

3 - The maximum time limit for a deposition is one day of seven hours.

4 - The deponent has the right to review and correct the transcript. He or she will have 30 days after receiving the transcript to review and submit corrections. However, this right must be affirmed and requested during the deposition. It is recommended that the appraiser expert always request this right to review and correct, as it will provide the appraiser with a copy of the transcript of the "oral report" for his or her workfile.

Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

The time limit to respond is 30 days from the date of service of the interrogatories.

6 0
3 years ago
Blake worked for West Oregon Lumber Company
ivanzaharov [21]
Yes he will win, the employer is at fault
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you find yourself boxed in by a vehicle on your left out right, ____ to clear space beside you
    5·1 answer
  • Idk but hi and have a nice day god bless
    11·2 answers
  • What regulation covers the wearing of the uniform?
    6·1 answer
  • QUESTION 9
    13·1 answer
  • Any research about spetember 11 2001 or 911
    11·1 answer
  • If someone answer my , i will vote him 5
    6·2 answers
  • The Great Compromise proposed by the committee headed by Roger Sherman called for
    12·2 answers
  • Multiple Choice
    14·2 answers
  • 2. ¿Qué necesita la persona para desplegar todo su potencial?
    13·1 answer
  • Haji is arrested at a warehouse in Industrial Park and is charged with the crime of theft. Haji will be prosecuted by Group of a
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!