Annan uses words like "deadliest," "suffering," "crimes," "violence" and "hatred." These words help the reader to see how the 20th century was uncomfortable, dangerous, and a bad time.
Although you haven't shown it, we can see from the context of your question that you are referring to Kofi Annan's speech during the Nobel Peace Prize.
In this speech, Annan states that:
- The world and the relationship between countries and people have changed a lot over time.
- However, not all of these changes were beneficial.
- Although the 21st century seems safer and more stable than the 20th century, boundaries between people still exist.
- These borders are no longer national borders and have started to be created by the social, economic, and political inequalities that surround us.
- Although the 20th century was a bad, criminal and violent moment in the history of humanity, we cannot say that there is a union between peoples and not even between people of the same nation, right now.
- This makes our current century still dangerous, unstable, and in need of improvement.
In short, he claims that we have evolved in technology, but our social relationships, empathy, and solidarity are still as shallow as in the 20th century.
More information:
brainly.com/question/462395?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
the answer is.....
Explanation:
aha thought i would scam u? NAHHh lolz answer is b.
:)
The answer to the question you have presented above would be irony. <span>In the poem "War Is Kind," what best describes the effect of the repetition of the lines “Do not weep. War is kind” is irony. If you think about it, war is full of suffering, pain and weeping, however, the author says that it is 'kind'.</span>
Answer:
I think it's D quickly is an adverb
Answer:
<u>from the book: "The Lady, or the Tiger" by Frank R. Stockton</u>
Explanation:
The original paragraph in the book where we get this quote reads;
"When a subject was accused of a crime of sufficient importance to interest the king, public notice was given that on an appointed day <em>the fate of the accused person would be decided in the king's arena, a structure which well deserved its name, </em>for, although its form and plan were borrowed from afar, its purpose emanated solely from the brain of this man, who, every barleycorn a king, knew no tradition to which he owed more allegiance than pleased his fancy, and who ingrafted on every adopted form of human thought and action the rich growth of his barbaric idealism."
