Seems like a great question please notify me when the answer comes in
<span>Slavery was morally wrong. He dod not like the idea of slavery which happened to cause the Civil War</span>
Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
Answer:
President William Mckinley believed that annexing Hawaii would<em> allow the Americans to have power over the Pacific and increase the commercial relationship with other Asian countries</em>. He also think that <em>Hawaii needed protection</em> <em>and it won't be able to stand on its own especially against the Japanese because it was helpless and didn't possess any form of military power to defend themselves.</em>
Explanation:
The reason for McKinley's annexation all boils down to the reason of<em> "manifest destiny." </em>This allowed the Americans to hold unto the belief that they had the right to take control of territories<em> (especially across the region of North America).</em> They believe it was their destiny.
