This question is about the article "When Clothing Labels Are a Matter of Life or Death".
Answer:
Promote visibility, extinguish subcontracting, pressure from investors.
Explanation:
In the article Kashyap shows how the clothing and footwear manufacturing industries have been one of the biggest centers of disrespect for human rights, causing workers to work exhaustively, earning few wages and being subjected to inhospitable environments and with little security.
For Kashyap, there are three processes that can prevent this from happening and can improve the lives of these workers. These processes are the transparency of the companies that consume the products of these industries, showing how the entire production process is, the extinction of subcontracting, which subjects workers to inhuman conditions of employment and pressure from investors who can charge for better working conditions.
Answer:
I think that the second option is better.
Explanation:
By using the second option, you are showing that you are directly quoting from the book itself, but the first option sounds like you are creating this dialogue yourself, which is wrong.
Hope this helps!
How was the proclamation of 1763 good for British and Native American relations? It helped keep relations between Native Americans and settlers peaceful. The king sent 10,000 troops to the colonies to enforce the Proclamation of 1763 and keep the peace with Native Americans.
Submission or adherence to existing norms is safer than going against it especially if you are inexperienced or if you do not understand them. In other words, it is better to stay passive or be compliant when you have not experienced it or when you lack new and not used to it.
