He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such disolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
The Supreme Court used what aspect of personal rights to right to privacy make their decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973.
<h3>What is
right to privacy ?</h3>
The right to privacy is been used in legal traditions which help in reducing governmental as well as private actions that threaten the privacy of individuals.
In this case, The Supreme Court used what aspect of personal rights to right to privacy make their decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973.
Learn more about right to privacy on:
brainly.com/question/13335106
#SPJ1
The person above me! Have a valid reason:)
I would say the 50 year old corporate executive who holds a masters in business. I would attribute this to his age and experience in life and interest in business that together would spark his interest in politics.
The Burma Railway<span>, also known as the </span>Death Railway was built in 1943 to protect Thailand.
