More info please or we cant answer the question
Answer:
the third option is the correct one
Unlawful search and seizure, the Supreme Court Ruling found that incriminating materials given to government representatives by private citizens or employees do not have the same rules regarding lawful search and seizure. For example, if someone provides incriminating documents that were procured without a search warrant and that someone is a private citizen, these documents are admissible in court and not subject to the same search and seizure laws as if they were being collected by a police officer.
Answer: Citizens give up some liberties to government in exchange for protection of their self-interests
Explanation: I’m willing to bet on it
<span>investigate suspected communist sympathizers</span>