Answer:
Explanation:
s = input()
name = input()
splits = s.split(" ")
i = 0
for i in range(len(splits)):
if(splits[i] == name):
break
print(splits[i+1])
Output:
Joe 123-5432 Linda 983-4123 Frank 867-5309
Frank 867-5309
Process finished with exit code 0
Universal health care is the most debated public health care program in the US. This is a kind of health program that seeks to be funded by the tax payer and is issued by the government. The argument is the benefit it will incur or as some individuals agitate the kind of loses it will bring to the entire economy. According to my cost benefit analysis, I find it more surprising that there is nothing to argue about since health is wealth, the healthier the nation the richer it is. The critics to the above program which is being supported by the current US government should refrain from such kind of action and go back to the drawing board to check the benefit of the overall insurance program. I argue the case in terms of utilitarianism, I base my findings on the morals that worth an action, an action that is purely determined by its utility in enhancing equitable assumption of happiness in the entire nation.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
The correct answer is option two.
In the excerpt from "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," the author Robert Louis Stevenson, intends to make the reader understand Mr. Utterson. The passage clearly makes quite a complete description of Mr. Utterson's character, personal, social and drinking habits, as well as his relationship with Mr. Ensfield.
