Answer:
The 1951 U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty
Explanation:
Answer: Many reasons. Most of them terrible.
But possibly for the identical reason that a decent parent who is totally against penalty would be willing to do and use it if their child keeps mindlessly walking into oncoming traffic (regardless of what number times they tried other methods to prevent them from doing it).
Sometimes you'll be able to keep your principals and morals… and stick out the dead kid. otherwise you can do whatever is important to prevent them from killing themselves and others… whether or not it means becoming a tyrant and a dictator in their eyes and therefore the eyes of others. whether or not it means going against your own core beliefs.
Explanation:
Answer:
totalitarian was in communist, fascist and countries because the state wanted control of how people should live there live and for propaganda purposes too.
the more power totalitarian countries have over the people,the less resistance they will be.
The answer is:
D. slowed the arms race between the Soviet Union and the United States.
Divided in two rounds of conversations the Strategic Arms Limitations Treaty (SALT) were a couple of treaties that were held between the USA and the URSS to find a way to keep the armmamentary race undercontrol. There were a lot of issues to be discussed, anti-ballistic misiles zones, that stated that only one was allowed by country which meant that the countries would only have this for the capitol, it slowed down the arms race up to the end of the cold war.
N 1880, San Fransisco enacted an ordinance that required all laundry businesses had to be in buildings that were made of stone or brick. If they wanted to have a laundry that was in a wooden building, they needed to get permission from the board of supervisors. Due to challenges in other employment areas, Chinese immigrants often worked in or owned laundromats. In fact, 89% of San Fransisco's laundry businesses were operated by workers of Chinese descent.
The board of supervisors began granting whites permission to have laundry businesses in wooden buildings but didn't grant permission to Chinese immigrants. Those that violated this ordinance had to pay a fine. Yick Wo was an operator for 22 years in San Fransisco. He did not have a permit and refused to pay the fine. Wo was arrested and convicted. He then appealed his conviction, saying that the law was discriminating against him because of his race. The court ruled that he was still protected under the 14th Amendment and dismissed all charges. Looking at the background for this case and the ruling, the best answer choice would be that the court ruled that Chinese Americans were able to operate laundry facilities, just as native-born citizens could.
