Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Since triangle DEF = triangle JKL, m<D = m<J, m<E = m<K, m<F = m<L.
m<F = m<L = 90 degrees
m<K = m<E = 5(m<D)
but m<E + m<D = 90 degrees [right angled triangle]
5(m<D) + m<D = 90 degrees
6(m<D) = 90 degrees
m<D = 90 / 6 = 15 degrees.
Probably miles, canyons are HUGE, it's only logical to use miles
Okay I'm a little lost because of the . next to the 2 but if they are separate your answers would be
3x+6x=yx (x=0)
c+5+11=12+7 (x=x=−y+c+5+<span>
</span>
Sorry I do not know I wish I could help you
