This is how I would go: (I'm just glossing over it, sorry if you think it lacks detail. :L)
<span>1. California does not deserve a seat in the United Nations. </span>
<span>2. The UN is only for nations; people in California are US citizens; they do not have a culture nor a culture that is exclusive to the rest of the US. In this sense, California is not a nation. (this is the definition of a nation bit.) </span>
<span>3. Federalism, the system where states and national governments share power. California (states in general) does not have the power to enter into treaties with foreign countries, nor regulate commerce with foreign countries. These powers are exclusive to the national government. This would mean that it cannot be given a seat, where these powers would be put into California's hands. I guess states governments would also fit into here somewhere. </span>
Im pretty sure the correct answer for this question will be D
but if
its wrong allwell go cry about it
Answer:
the principle that the US should give support to countries or peoples threatened by Soviet forces or Communist insurrection. First expressed in 1947 by US President Truman in a speech to Congress seeking aid for Greece and Turkey, the doctrine was seen by the Communists as an open declaration of the Cold War.
Explanation:
4. Cotton Gin harvested cotton
5. Because the cotton gin could harvest so much more, cotton farmers would buy and work more slaves for more profit.
6. A few major ones were immigration, making railroads, and using tariffs to ward foreign countries away from competing with the American market.
7. Industrial Revolution, I think the answer they want you to give is being blocked off from trading with England and France.