The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The author use paragraphs 30-31 to refine their ideas in the following way.
When Thomas Jefferson, who drafted the Declaration of Independence, wrote <em>"In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress..." </em>he wants to conclude that American colonists have tried many ways to get a proper answer from the British crown and the only answer they had received had been a repeated injury, which means, the King still considered aggressions to the colonists.
When Jefferson wrote <em>"...That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved..." </em> he is making the strong conclusive statement that from now on, the colonies are declaring independence from the English crown so the colonies are free and independent states, that have the power and rights to do the things they freely consider correct.
The <span>Declaration of Independence intended to be a formal declaration of war:
</span>
A. Yes. Though fighting preceded the writing, it wasintended to be a formal declaration of war.
Conflicts between American colonists and British soldiers started in April 1775, however the formal Declaration of Independence happened on July 4, 1776.
Stooped but probs tired and probs happy if he/she won.
Offering a counterclaim and giving enough evidence to disprove that counterclaim strengthens the argument by reassuring the reader/audience that the you are well-informed and able to discern multiple perspectives. It’s like when you’re trying to convince your parents to let you go out with your friends at night or on a school night, you should state why you want to go and you should also acknowledge what they’re trying to say otherwise they’ll think that you’re not aware of the dangers out there.
