Answer:
承认中国文化的原因与承认其他文化的原因相同。当然，中华文化有好有坏，但是，公平地讲，所有文化都有。为什么中国文化应该被分享的例子是中国人彼此相处的方式。年轻一代倾向于更多地支持他们，将长者视为“领导者”（尽管在天门广场事件之后的许多年中，这种现象逐渐消失了）。但是，像所有文化一样，每种文化都应该与感兴趣的人分享，并针对每种不同的文化继续遵循以下传统。
Translation:
Chinese culture should be recognized for the same reasons that other culture should be recognized. Granted, there are the good and bad of chinese culture, but, to be fair, all cultures have such. Examples of why chinese culture should be shared is the way that Chinese people treat each other. The younger generation tend to be more supportive see the elders as "leaders" (though this has worn off throughout the years following the Tianmen Square incident). However, like all cultures, each and every should be shared to those interested in, and continue the following traditions for each and every different one.
~
The verb ending -mus denotes first person plural verbs in Latin.
Answer:
The correct answers are
1.The player would have to ignore the racism he would encounter on the field.
3.The player would have to prove his ability as both a player and a man.
5.The player had to be both talented and humble, which is a rare combination.
Answer:
okay lets start with effect for example cause and effect if something happen it is the cause and because of that what is the effect of what happen or a result or consequence have an effect on; make a difference to.
Explanation:
i explain everything up there.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order.
Explanation:
In writing, paraphrasing implies using the ideas of an external source and author and expressing them by using your own words, because of this a strong paraphrasing would change the language used but keep the essence and main points of the original ideas. In the excerpt presented, the author tried to paraphrase a passage that describes cone snails. However, in the passage paraphrased the author uses the same terms and words than in the original passage which means he or she is not expressing the ideas of the original passage with his or her own words but only changing the order of ideas the text and therefore this is not a strong paraphrasing and can even be considered a plagiarism as the same words and ideas are being used. Therefore, this text can be described as "It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order".
