Answer:
both are places that have shelter ? is that good sorry lol
Explanation:
In ancient literature, heroes were usually described as males who sacrificed themselves for the benefit of others. They also held certain characteristic such as can be seen through the chivalric code. They were expected to do great deeds of glory to even be counted as a hero in their society. This is why literature such as King Arthur were so popular in their times.
Although heroism in modern can still be represented through the lens of a superhero or war hero, it is generally given a lot more lax, and usually a lot easier to obtain. Unlike in the times of the knights, most people aren't expected to slay dragons, or rescue a damsel in distress. The theme of the "everyday hero" is certainly a huge difference between the two. In modern film, heroes are usually portrayed as the average Joe, sort of character, with flaws and vices just like anyone else. Heroes are now seen as obtainable characters with decent stances of virtue.
Answer:
If we help each other and fight side by side, / we will make a lasting name for ourselves, / we will stamp our fame on men’s minds forever.
Explanation:
Stephen Mitchell's book <em>Gilgamesh: A New English Version</em> is a retelling of the epic narrative about Gilgamesh and his heroic acts. The book delves into the bravery and courage of the hero and his characters of being a liked leader.
The given excerpt from the text reveals his leadership skills. He implored his men to keep on fighting even though they may be tired, for they are almost done. He inspires them to press on despite their fatigue and weakness. And in this leadership, he also reveals his belief in teamwork when he said asked them to<em> "help each other and fight side by side"</em>. Then they <em>"will stamp [their] fame on men's minds forever"</em>. This shows his true leadership quality, showing his belief for their teamwork and not faltering to the 'lone-hero' act.
Thus, the correct answer is the last/ fourth option.
Absurd apply to the dissension between the human tendency to quest inherent value and meaning life and the human inability to find any. Accordingly, Absurdism is a philosophical school of consideration starting that the efforts of humanity to seek inherent content will eventually fail because the sheer amount of information as well as the vast domain of the unknown make total certainly impossible.
