1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANEK [815]
3 years ago
13

PLAESE HELP WITH THIS!! 25 POINTS!!

History
2 answers:
Lilit [14]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The jury awarded Apple $533.3 million for Samsung's violation of so-called design patents and $5.3 million for the violation of so-called utility patents.

A jury found that several Samsung smartphones did infringe those patents. All told, Apple was awarded $399 million in damages for Samsung's design patent infringement, the entire profit Samsung made from its sales of the infringing smartphones.

On December 6, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc., No. 15-777, holding that in the case of a multicomponent product, the “article of manufacture” that is the basis for an award of damages under Section 289 of the Patent Act

nadya68 [22]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. was the first of a series of ongoing lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers; between them, the companies made more than half of smartphones sold worldwide as of July 2012.[1] In the spring of 2011, Apple began litigating against Samsung in patent infringement suits, while Apple and Motorola Mobility were already engaged in a patent war on several fronts.[2] Apple's multinational litigation over technology patents became known as part of the mobile device "smartphone patent wars": extensive litigation in fierce competition in the global market for consumer mobile communications.[3] By August 2011, Apple and Samsung were litigating 19 ongoing cases in nine countries; by October, the legal disputes expanded to ten countries.[4][5] By July 2012, the two companies were still embroiled in more than 50 lawsuits around the globe, with billions of dollars in damages claimed between them.[6] While Apple won a ruling in its favor in the U.S., Samsung won rulings in South Korea, Japan, and the UK. On June 4, 2013, Samsung won a limited ban from the U.S. International Trade Commission on sales of certain Apple products after the commission found Apple had violated a Samsung patent,[7] but this was vetoed by U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman.[8]

On December 6, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided 8-0 to reverse the decision from the first trial that awarded nearly $400 million to Apple and returned the case to Federal Circuit court to define the appropriate legal standard "article of manufacture" because it is not the smartphone itself but could be just the case and screen to which the design patents relate.[9]

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Help!! 10 points.. test due soon!
uranmaximum [27]
Answer: Bill of Rights.

Explanation: Article III, Section 2 guarantees a jury trial in all criminal trials (except impeachment). ... But Magna Carta's legacy is reflected most clearly in the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the Constitution ratified by the states in 1791.
6 0
3 years ago
"We have passed the stage of infancy, and reached the perfection of manhood. We receive our habit of mind from God, and know wha
artcher [175]

Answer:

Through the Bible, God forbids the creation and veneration of all icons.

Only God knows what is appropriate, so humans should not make guesses.

Icons should only be banned during the religious instructions of young children

Modern Christians understand the difference between appreciating icons and idolatry.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best illustrates the concept of total war in World War I?
8090 [49]
I believe the answer is D. WWI was the first "total war," in which all of the people in all of the involved countries participated and were impacted.
4 0
3 years ago
Do you think the founding father were right to create the electoral college?
SIZIF [17.4K]
No in a lot of ways the founding fathers were trying to limit the power of the masses to choose who governed them by creating the electoral college creating a sort of parent organization capable of over ruling the wish of the people which in of its self is also a type of tyranny.
5 0
4 years ago
What was the difference between a British colony in Africa and the British sphere of influence in China in the late 1800s?
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer: Well from 1880-1900 Britain gained control over or occupied what are now known as Egypt, Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, South Africa, Gambia, Sierra Leone, northwestern Somalia, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana, Nigeria. That meant that the British ruled 30% of Africa's people at one time.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the statements that best describe the ancient Hebrews.
    7·1 answer
  • I NEED AN ANSWER FAST, i WILL GIVE 11 POINT AND FREIND
    5·1 answer
  • What groups had colonial representation in colonial america?
    7·2 answers
  • The position of the United States toward Latin America in the 1800s can be characterized as____.
    13·2 answers
  • Rousseau wrote in The Social Contract, “As soon as any man says of the affairs of the State ‘What does it matter to me?’ the Sta
    11·1 answer
  • determine wether the following features belong to Buddhism or Confucianism. 1. stressed the importance of establishing a sound e
    8·2 answers
  • I<br> How has the Roman Empire influenced the world today?<br> ASAP I NEEE TO RACE
    14·1 answer
  • B. Analyzing Causes As you read about the Louisiana Purchase, write down the reasons that Napoleon might have had for selling th
    14·1 answer
  • How did Julius Caesar become leader of Rome?
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!