Answer: had significant influence on the culture of the regions under their control
Explanation: European colonization was the policy or practice of acquiring full or partial political control over other countries and territories, founding a colony and occupying it with settlers while exploiting them economically. Europeans did this on almost all the continents, from the Americas to Asia, down to Africa.
Despite the exit of the colonizers, many of the societies are still greatly influenced by their masters, as seen in the type of government practised in India as well as Brazil picking Portuguese as their official language. Over the decades of being exposed to the colonizers, a lot of transference occur and the impact of the Europeans' stay lingers in the culture and acts of the territories they occupied.
The term traces its origins to South Africa<span>. In 1948, the ruling National Party (NP) instituted a system of racial segregation. They established a system of white minority rule over the black majority natives and other racial groups. ... They were evicted from their homes and forced into segregated residential areas.
Just to make sure no plagiarism. </span>https://www.google.com/search?q=How+did+the+policy+of+apartheid+affect+most+of+South+Africans&rlz=1C...
Answer:
The main advantages of the USA were:
A larger population, the USA had the majority of large cities of North America at the time, and a lot of immigrants, while the Confederacy was mainly rural, and not as populated. This larger population meant a more numerous army.
And a more powerful economy with some industry, which facilitated the production of arms and supplies for the military.
The disadvantage was that USA was the aggressor, and had to take up territory, while the confederacy only had to defend itself.
The confederacy main advantage was that as defenders, they knew most of the territory better, and had overall a more advantageous geographical position, at least at the start of the war. The main disadvantage for the Confederacy was precisely the smaller population -which means a smaller army- and the less developed economy, which was mainly agrarian, lacking almost any form of industry.
What are you asking in this question i don't understand.
They were both by their government army
