Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
1. The benefit is that is passes the general message in a surreal manner, the intended message is passed but with a little sense of wit and humor which would create a soft landing on the readers mind without taking away the seriousness of the message passed.
2. Michael risks losing the attention of a few sentimental sect i.e, poor people that feel the joke was not necessary and that shots were taken at them. Not everyone is humorous.
3. The message would still be effective regardless only that, the humor embedded won;t be present and readers that love such would feel what was written was too serious lol.
4. 'The wounded eagle glided as fast as a kite in a storm', this implied that the manner with which the eagle was gliding down, it look as though it was a kite basking in the euphoria of the wind. In a serious tone, it can go like this; 'The wounded eagle quickly sought a resting place'.
Second example is ' Chelsea broke the bones of Manchester United like she was the grim reaper'. With a serious tone; 'Chelsea won Manchester United squarely'
5. Changing the tone made the argument more serious and focused on the intending point.
6. Not necessarily, it all depends on the reader but these days, authors try to spice up stories with a little bit of humor to ensure the attention of their readers stays intact and to also eliminate any chance of boredom.
Answer:
POG
Explanation:
BH3V KH42BJEWDBVC2VECFQBRGVWT YES
Answer:
Introspection, Titchener
Explanation:
Introspection is a process through which a person looking inwards and examines one's thoughts, feelings. It a controlled and well structured and scientific way to express one's feelings thought. It is a self-observation experiment. It was first developed by William Wundt. Wundt gives training to the people and observes to analyze the content of their thoughts.
Edward Titchener is a wundt student who also utilizes this technique. In some way, he used the wundt technique in a wrong manner. Wundt was interested in showing the conscious experience of a person but Titchener was interested in breaking the mental components of a person. It is a great source of self-knowledge (introspection). Even it provides a piece of knowledge about a person which is not possible in another way.
Answer: <u><em>NO</em></u>
Explanation: Socailism is very common to this day , comunism and socailism is bassicly the same thing , with countriesthat are socailist that exist as we speak are :
.China
.Cuba
.Lao
.Veitnam
