Answer:
Frame
Explanation:
I took public speaking at middle school, high school, and college level
"the relevance of the idea to your life"
When analyzing or writing a paper about a fictional work, you could analyze the symbolism and/or implications in the piece of fiction. In the academic setting, it simply doesn't matter if ideas conveyed in writing impact your life or not.
Answer:
The correct answer is option d.) the title of the encyclopedia and the page number where the quote appeared.
Explanation:
Of all the options given, the best option is D.
It would be much better if you could include more complete information such as an editor's name and the volume of the encyclopedia, but if you do not have this information you can leave it out of your citation.
But it would be best if you at least have the name of the encyclopedia and the page number where the quote comes from.
So we can say that the correct answer is option D.
An <span>Essay test
</span><span>focuses on a debate and discussion of key content and main topics</span>
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
