1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.
2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
When my cousins come to visit, we put an extra leaf in the table to make it bigger.
Problem: Cousins coming to visit = more people to fit in the desk
Solution: putting an extra leaf
Machiavelli support his claim buy using the logical evidence through historical examples. Thus option 3rd is correct.
<h3>What is theme of The Prince?</h3>
The Prince's overarching message is that using immoral measures to further a prince's goals, such as glory and survival, can be justified. The author of The prince is Niccolo Machiavelli.
The story is about the Prince whose name is Agathocles who was the son of the plotter who became the prince of Syracuse.
The author used logic to demonstrate that in this instance, rulers can be harshly if it is beneficial to them and required for their security. Thus option 3rd is correct.
Learn more about The Prince here:
brainly.com/question/11391079
#SPJ1
Answer: I don't know the answer, but this is dum, it's on my test.
Explanation:
