1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kykrilka [37]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process?

History
2 answers:
Arada [10]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is A) publishing articles.

<em>Publishing articles is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process.</em>

We use historical thinking when our critical thinking or intellectual abilities evaluate sources of information. We use this critical thinking to analyze primary sources in order to understand history; events, incidents, conflicts, or situations that occurred in the past. In historical thinking, we use multiple perspectives, different sources, research primary documents, the connection among evidence, and the comprehension of the historical context. But publishing articles is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process.

lys-0071 [83]3 years ago
6 0
In general, "A. Publishing articles" is not a necessary part of the historical thinking process, since this is usually done after a conclusion has already been drawn due to research.
You might be interested in
What was a common problem for small farmers?
olganol [36]
All of the above isnfnskkwjkjajddowmfnsjd
3 0
3 years ago
What was not reaffirmed by the Council of Trent?
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Explanation:

-That only the Catholic Church had the authority to interpret the Bible.

8 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP ME I WILL MARK U AS BRAINLIEST
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

the 1st answer.

Explanation:

In all of the 1900s, political figures went conservative and sought to go against such communist claims. In supreme court, it was ruled that the safety of the United States was a higher concern than accused communists because they represented danger.

7 0
3 years ago
What statements best articulates a noninterventionist argument against American imperialism
vladimir1956 [14]

The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''

Answer: Option B

<u>Explanation:</u>

The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.

Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.

4 0
3 years ago
5. A government in which citizens elect delegates. *
Anna [14]

Answer:

Representative democracy

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was a border state during the Civil War?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about how Brazil's population has changed over time?
    7·1 answer
  • What role did the Factory System of Manufacturing have during the Industrial Revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • The Oregon territory was contested between the United States and what other country? A.Mexico B.France C.Canada D.Britain
    6·2 answers
  • Who promoted the idea of the self-determination of nations?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the berlin conference of 1884
    15·2 answers
  • Which statements about the reign of louis 14 are true
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why a system of alliances could cause multiple countries to join a war that starts between only 2 countries.
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the youngest delegate at the constitutional convention in 1787.
    11·2 answers
  • Who would eventually become the Unior<br> Commander of the Northern forces?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!