Answer:
Thank you! Do it for yourself too!
Explanation:
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
The first permanent English colony in North America was Jamestown, Virginia
founded in 1607. It was a business venture of the Virginia Company of London, an
English firm that planned to make money by sending people to America to find gold
and other valuable natural resources and then ship the resources back to England.
Initially, the colony suffered from a lack of leadership and profitable enterprises
which resulted in starvation and near failure of the colony. In order to induce
Englishmen to come to the Virginia Colony, the company instituted a series of
changes that helped the colony grow. The company’s monopoly on land was
lessened which allowed the colonists to acquire land for themselves. English
common law was imposed and eventually a measure of self-government was
allowed. At this point, more women and families began to come to come to
Virginia.
Tobacco Cultivation Changed Virginia
There was no gold in the Jamestown colony, but John Rolf successfully crossbred
native strains of tobacco with West Indian tobacco. Tobacco quickly became a
major cash crop and an important source of wealth in Virginia. Tobacco cultivation
was labor-intensive. People known as indentured servants were sent from England
to work for the Virginia Company. Indentured servants worked for a land owner in
exchange for their passage to the New World in hopes of eventually claiming their
own land. More tobacco cultivation required more indentured servants. Tensions
began to develop over the continual need to supply land to newly freed indentured
servants. African slaves were introduced to the Virginia Colony in 1619. Eventually,
plantation owners came to rely on African slaves as a more profitable and renewable
source of labor. As a result, Virginia’s colonial economy became highly dependent
on slavery.
House of Burgesses
The Virginia Company established a legislative assembly that was similar to
England’s Parliament, called the House of Burgesses. The House of Burgesses was
the first European-style legislative body in the New World. The representatives
were both appointed by the company’s governor and elected by land-owning males
of Virginia. Laws enacted were subject to approval by the governor and the London
board of directors, but it was the first self-government in the colonies. However, all
the colonists did not own land and therefore lacked representation. i dont know if this helped i hope it did
The answer to your question would be that the sentence that uses two prepositional phrases is the following one: The helicopter landed among the cars in the parking lot. The two prepositional phrases in the sentence are "among the cars" and "in the parking lot".
A prepositional phrase is a group of words made up of a preposition and its object. The object may be a noun, a pronoun, a gerund or a clause. What is more, a prepositional phrase functions as an adjective or adverb.
