Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Based on my research(since the choices were not given), the United States tried to influence Vietnam’s national elections in 1956 when they supported Ngo Dinh Diem as president in South Vietnam. H<span>e was then named Prime Minister of the State of Vietnam during the Nguyen dynasty.</span>
The best answer is, D. the camps held people who had done nothing wrong.
The Japanese Internment camps established in the United States as a response to the attack on Peral Harbor by the Japanese was a drastic action taken by the government and military and not supported by everyone. Some Americans, including those in government, where weary of using the internment camps to house Japanese-Americans because they were being held there, against their will, even though they had nothing wrong.
In his letters and in his Farewell Address, George Washington gave Americans advice about the future direction of our country. Pick one piece of advice and explain Washington's position. Then evaluate that advice. Was it good advice? Is it practical advice? Is it advice that we could follow today? Why or why not? Explain your answer with at least one reference to the issues and political situation of our country today.
Answer:
"Union volunteers were more likely than Confederates to join for the money." (B)
Explanation:
the answer is B on edge
