Emerson's speech and John Brown's show that there is quite a similarity and contrast between the two, and it's born out of the justification for Brown's concern to free the Virginia slaves in the united states during his abolitionist movement.
<h2>Further Explanation</h2>
Ralph Waldo Emerson and John Brown's speech were both tendered to the court after Brown was convicted of treason. The speeches were both passing the same message. Emerson stated that Brown was a hero, patriotic, noble and unjustly accused as a traitor, claiming that was right.
Emerson's speech was a sort of praises to commend Brown's movement to free the Virginia slaves thereby relieving his family of their grief prior to Brown's death on 8th November 1859; his speech commends that what Brown had done was good and that he did not commit murder or treason, instead, he wanted to free the slaves.
Brown, the abolitionist, stated the same thing by insisting that his punishment, death by hanging, was unjustly based on the fact that he was doing the right thing.
A comparison is seen between Emerson's speech and Brown---they both pass the same message that the freedom of slaves by Brown's abolitionist movement was right. The only contrast or difference in the speech is that Emerson's speech was directly focused on Brown and his movement in an appraisal form while Brown's speech was directed to the court to justify what he was doing as being right.
Learn more about Emerson's speech and John Brown speech at:
brainly.com/question/9981560
#learnwithbrainly
Answer:
Alexander the great continued exploring even though his Greek soldiers quit
Explanation:
The text states that Alexander's army were tired of fighting so they did not want to continue so they quit. Alexander still wanted to explore so he sent his close friend, Nearchus to search the coast the India. Therefore, while his army quit, he continued to explore with his close friend Nearchus. Hope this helps you
Answer:
The "data " is the subject to study, one way to minimize the effects of the expermienter bias on the putcome of the study is to have thos e variables well defined.
Explanation:
A "data" in a experiment is every information that is got from it, whether is the number of times each subject makes some activity, or stays somehow, etc.
Those are defined as the variables, the less variables the expermiente has, the better, so, it is important that the investigators defined which variables are truly important for the expermient.
What should have done to minimize the effects of the experimenter bias on the outcome of the study?
To try to mantain the variables as the less possible.
What were the dangers of the principal investigator assuimg the role of prison superintendent?
Thatthe main objective of the experiment was discovered and itwould cause repercussions on the principal investigator´s well being.
Answer:
When Raegan talked about freedom in his address, he used "repetition" as a rhetorical device. Explanation: Repetition is a rhetorical device that is used to repeat some phrases or important words to put emphasize or make the idea or stance stronger.
