Hi !!
The conclusion to Damian's argument is positive as he is aware of what the problem still is the second one ===>
-
EXPLANATION
<u>He cannot say</u><u> </u>:
1- it's absurd that we have this problem when there is such an easy solution, <em>because he wants things to change</em>
<u>He knows that </u>:
1- Unfortunately, more 100 million plastic grocery bags are still being thrown away every year.
2- Although attempts have been made to recycle these plastic bags, the problem cause by them still exists.
So it's conclusion is that we have to change ►
<u>We need</u> to take active steps and change <u>our habits</u> by using reusable bags instead.
hope this helps ☺☺☺
Schaffer mistakenly told his assistant to strike alarm Box 342, and as a result, firefighters were directed to an incorrect location during the Chicago fire of 1871.
This is the best example of adding concrete details. It specifically says which alarm box Schaffer told his assistant. The original sentence makes it seem as the miscommunication was the big problem. While it was a problem, the fact that the firefighters went to the incorrect location is really the reason the Chicago fire of 1871 was so devastating. Including these details makes the writing much clearer and easier for the reader to follow.
Answer:
The wicket keeper did not allow a single ball to pass him eventhough he wore no gloves.
