The slope-intercept form of a line:
We have:
Substitute:
Put the values of coordinates of the point (1, 5) to the equation of a line:
Answer: 
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
I don't know how to explain it but
10/2=5 (Driver A)
20/2= 10 (Driver B)
Sorry if it's not right
Let's call Frank's house F, Derek's one D n Evan's E.
F(5,-4)
E(-3,-4)
D(-3,4)
FE=5-(-3)=5+3=8
ED=4-(-4)=4+4=8
We can see the triangle is a half of a square, so FD is 8(√2)≈11.312
11.312+8=19.312
The answer is C.19.31
Answer:65.9
66X12=792 INCHES
792+64.7=856.7
856.7 DIVIDED BY 13 =65.9
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: No, Titus is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation: Two shapes are <u>congruent</u> when they have the same size and shape, but one is created of rotation, reversion or translation of the other.
So, hexagons FEDCBA and F'E'D'C'B'A' are congruent because they have the same size and shape, however they are reversed and translated from each other, i.e.:
Comparing the coordinates of both hexagons:
F (-6,6) → F' (6, -4)
A (-10,6) → A' (10,-4)
E (-4,4) → E' (4, -6)
B (-12,4) → B' (12, -6)
D (-6,2) → D' (6, -8)
C (-10,2) → C' (10, -8)
We notice that the transformation necessary to transform FEDCBA into F'E'D'C'B'A' is
- multiply x-coordinate by (-1);
- subtract y-coordinate by 10;
Therefore, it is (x,y) → ( -x, y-10).
So, Titus is incorrect about the transformations that prove the hexagons are congruent.
