The *Argument* is the *fifth* choice the the *Claim* is the *first* and *second* *choice*.
Command over the language English helps you in commanding the whole world. It is because if you are proficient in the language English then you are like a person who has a greater vocabulary and all the skills are perfect for you. The world is a place where the international language is English. So when you have a command in English you can go to any country and get a higher edication and even a great job.
That means even if you are not a native English the world will show respect to you. When you command English you can reach in any platform very easily. You can get your own opportunity to stand yourself.
D. Coming for to carry me home
In<em> Animal Farm </em>(1945) by George Orwell<em>,</em> Napoleon represents Stalin, who built a dictatorship under the guise of communism.
<em>Animal Farm </em>was written by Orwell as <u>a satire on soviet totalitarianism</u>. The animals' rebellion is an allegory of the Russian Revolution in 1917. In that way, the writer portrays the ideals of the revolution as well as the development of political corruption.
Orwell satirizes Joseph Stalin, one of the fathers of the Russian Revolution, by representing him in the figure of a pig, Napoleon. In the novel, he also explores the relationship between Stalin and Trotsky, who is represented by Snowball. In that way,<u> the author equates pigs with human tyrants</u>. This becomes clearer at the end of the novel when it becomes impossible to distinguish men from pigs.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
