1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AysviL [449]
3 years ago
14

Explain ONE cultural or economic change in the late twentieth century that historians who support the

History
2 answers:
Stells [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In the late twentieth century, a cultural or economic change that historians who support the process of “de-centering” world history would likely cite as a limitation of Barton’s arguments in the passage was the downfall of the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

Barton's argument in the passage is to de-center Europe, you will need to vandalize the past. An economic development in the late twentieth century that would explain Barton’s argument about the “impending decline of the West” in the second paragraph is the Soviet Union unsuccessfully invading Afghanistan.

adelina 88 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: transportation

Explanation: i did the saq

You might be interested in
-Checks and balances
Alika [10]

Answer:

1. Congress: Can take in regard of this and possibly veto, or pass this.

Supreme Court(s): May declare legislative/executive actions due to violation in constitution.

2. President: He/She is not mandated to carry out the orders of the Supreme Court. However, the executive branch can place a check on the Supreme Court with/through refusal.

Congress: May not strip the U.S. Supreme Court of jurisdiction over those cases that fall under the Court's original jurisdiction defined in the U.S. Constitution. Congress can limit only the appellate jurisdiction of the Court.

3. President: Returns the unsigned legislation to the originating house of Congress within a 10 day period usually with a memorandum of disapproval or a “veto message.” Congress can override the President's decision if it musters the necessary two–thirds vote of each house.

Supreme Court: Limits. Congress may not strip the U.S. Supreme Court of jurisdiction over those cases that fall under the Court's original jurisdiction defined in the U.S. Constitution. Congress can limit only the appellate jurisdiction of the Court.

4. Congress: The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war.

Supreme Court: The Supreme Court does not have any enforcement power; the enforcement power lies solely with the executive branch. However, The supreme court may have the power to overturn an executive order by passing legislation that invalidates it.

Explanation:

The question is stating/asking how the other powers will keep the main statement in check, basically meaning, how each powers will evaluate during one of these situations.

Depending on each power, they will be able to evaluate how they should solve the problems.

Congress: These people have the power to veto the president's request, as well as pass it, if they approve.

Supreme Courts: The court has the ability to declare acts (Legislative/Executive) in violation of the constitution.

This goes for all position in the political order in the world, but I have only named a few, if you would like, I can put more if needed.

(Some of the answers were part of info online, so that I could help you, but also help you understand better, as I am not that well in politics)

8 0
3 years ago
How did major strikes prevent large industrial unions from maintaining power and influence
Verizon [17]
The main way in which major strikes prevented large industrial unions from maintaining power and influence is that they upset the voters, since these strikes often shut down production of many of the goods a large part of the population used. 
8 0
3 years ago
One goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
One goal of the Congress of Vienna was to restore power to The Monarch
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did monarchy start
Marrrta [24]

Monarchy is the oldest form of government in the United Kingdom. In a monarchy, a king or queen is Head of State. The British Monarchy is known as a constitutional monarchy. This means that, while The Sovereign is Head of State, the ability to make and pass legislation resides with an elected Parliament.

A monarchy is a kind of government where a monarch, a kind of hereditary ruler (someone who inherits their office), is the head of state. Monarchs usually rule until they die or pass down (when a monarch resigns it is called abdication). Most monarchies are hereditary, but some are elected.

3 0
4 years ago
How did colonists communicate with the british government in london to lobby for their interests?
Serjik [45]
They sent letters back and fourth by ship
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What contributed to the Battle of Stalingrad becoming a turning point in the war?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the main effect of the Nuremberg laws?
    11·2 answers
  • Which colony was the first to establish freedom of religion for their colonists?
    12·2 answers
  • Who did roger williams spend the winter with?
    8·2 answers
  • The separation and sharing of powers means that government cannot reach decisions quickly.
    5·1 answer
  • Do any of you guys watch xqc?
    7·2 answers
  • Would Locke have been for or against slavery
    10·2 answers
  • List 5 specific advantages that Europeans had in carving out empires in the Americas
    6·1 answer
  • What was one major result of the War of 1812?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following MOST influenced the decision to block all American shipping? A) the high price Jefferson paid to buy the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!