Answer: The Congress had no authority to levy taxes, and was required to request money, supplies, and troops from the states to support the war effort. Individual states frequently ignored these requests.
The answer is <u>"Collecting, reviewing, and analyzing data to identify safety trends".</u>
The motivation behind the Army Safety Program is to shield and protect Army assets around the world, to incorporate Soldiers, Army regular folks, and Army property against coincidental misfortune. It accommodates open wellbeing occurrence to Army tasks and exercises. From the leader to the Soldier and non military personnel worker, mischance avoidance is everybody's obligation.
There are various advantages when risks are distinguished and controlled. For instance:
Damage counteractive action – ensure our staff
Administration change – a unit that has a proactive, compelling security program has pioneers that search for the issues previously they move toward becoming mischances.
Mission security – ability and status
Harm control – anticipate inadvertent loss of hardware
and many more...
Hope it helps!
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read Individualism and Commitment in American Life. By Robert N. Bellah, Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton
True or False?
The researchers in Habits of the Heart thought that the individualism of modern life was a benefit to communities of memory.
Answer: False
Explanation:
The scholars understood that individualism created a problem that could be solved through the cultivation of communities of memory. They found that individualism was impoverishing the American language in a way that became more and more challenging for people to talk about commitment. Communities of memory where traces of second languages could be preserved were believed to be capable of transforming the first language of individualism based on the traditions of biblical religion and civic republicanism.
Letter A is the correct answer.
As a matter of fact, people can create ideas from simple impressions, which can be by contiguity, resemblance, and cause and effect. David Hume was a very well-known British empiricist in the Early Modern Period who suggested that the idea of cause and effect is simply based on the discovery of relations between pairs of events and that assumptions of cause and effect between a pair of events cannot been considered 100% true. According to him, unless there is a rule that the future will always resemble the past, we can't justify what we believe is true based on past experiences.
