The President inside the executive department can veto a regulation, but the legislative branch can override that veto with sufficient votes. The legislative department has the electricity to approve Presidential nominations, manage the budget, and might impeach the President and do away with her or him from office.
The govt department consists of out and enforces laws. It consists of the president, VP, the cupboard, government departments, independent organizations, and other boards, commissions, and committees
The executive department can take a look at the legislative branch by using providing laws, growing an annual price range, can name unique classes of Congress, and lastly, the executive branch can veto any legislation.
Learn more about executives here:
brainly.com/question/15549622
#SPJ9
Answer:
To reduce soft money contributions to political parties.
it has caused spending by interest groups to increase
Explanation:
giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech:
in "citizen united v fec" the supreme court said because corporations giving money to political campaigns is considered free speech and the government cant restrict it. giving money is protected under the first amendment
Soft money is unregulated donations to political parties for general "party-building" purposes, not the support of a particular candidate so it avoid various legal limitations
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act aka McCain-Feingold Act is a major amendment of the Federal Election Campaign Act 1971 passed by the US congress in 2002. Its goal was to reduce the increased use of soft money to fund advertising by political parties.
brainly.com/question/11364371
investopedia
wikipedia
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Puerto Rico no tiene lagos
Answer:
Then, in the early 1960s, the Supreme Court rendered a string of decisions known as the “reapportionment cases” that fundamentally changed the voting landscape for African Americans. In no uncertain terms, the court required that representation in federal and state legislatures be based substantially on population. Baker v.
Explanation:
True because no one knew what the America’s could hold
