All categories

3 years ago

can anyone help and explain why this is either proportional or not? urgent!! (it needs an explanation too)

Mathematics

1 answer:

Step2247 [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Yes it is proportional

Step-by-step explanation:

Notice how when x goes up 1 y goes up by 1.6. There is a pattern, if there is no pattern then you would see that numbers either go up or down with no pattern.

You might be interested in

Please someone help me

hram777 [196]

The answer is 57 inches

5 0

3 years ago

Please help me no one even bothers to help so plzzzz i BEGGGGGGGGGGG

user100 [1]

Answer:

Here's what I get.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you dilate an object by a scale factor, you multiply its coordinates by the same number.

If the scale factor is 4, the rule is (x, y) ⟶ (4x, 4y)

Your table then becomes

$\begin{array}{lcl}\textbf{Vertices of}& \, & \textbf{Vertices of}\\\textbf{VWXY}& \, & \textbf{V'W'X'Y'}\\V(-1 ,1) & \quad & V'(-4, 4)\\W(-1, 2) & \quad & W'(-4, 8)\\X(2, -1) & \quad & X'(8 ,-4)\\Y(2, 2) & \quad & Y'(8, 8)\\\end{array}$

The diagram below shows figure VVXY as a green bow-tie and its image V'W'X'Y' in orange.

The scale factor is greater than one, so the dilation is an enlargement.

7 0

3 years ago

How you divide a decimal

Tom [10]

Easy you just divide it like a regular then put move the decimal to the left the number of times letters are behind it.

8 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me simplify (2n + 2) + (8 + 8)

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Lets Combine Like Terms. The only combineable terms are 8 and 8. So if we combine them they will equal 16. And we will have (2n+2)=16

2. Let's isolate the variable. We can do this by subtracting 2 from both sides. This will come out to 2n+14.

3. Let's further isolate the variable. We can do this by dividing both sides by two, which will finally come out to n=7

3 0

3 years ago

I need help! this is missing

mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

top right

Step-by-step explanation:

if you solve an equation for a triangle using this method you'll get this result

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers