Answer:
a. Product X = 3.50 years
Product Y = 3.25 years
b. Product Y
Explanation:
The cash flows for the two products as well as the balance at the end of each year is given as follows:
For both products, the payback period is reached between the third and fourth year.
Product X:
Product Y:
Under the payback method, the alternative that presents the shortest payback period should be selected. Therefore, Product Y should be selected.
Answer:
have a high "divorce rate."
Explanation:
A strategic alliance can as well reffered to as strategic partnership and can be regarded as agreement that exist between two parties or more so that they can work in acheiving some objectives they agreed on even though they still remains as an independent organization to each other. It should be noted that Experience indicates that strategic alliances have a high "divorce rate."
Answer:
c. May be able to avoid liability to the extent she had no reason to know of the deficiency (and did not have actual knowledge) when filing the return. The burden of proof will be on her.
Explanation:
The doctrine of <em>innocent spouse relief</em> might apply here. Mrs. Jones will have to prove that:
- the income that was omitted was earned by her husband, not her.
- she must prove that when she signed the tax filings, she was not aware of the omission.
- after examining all the facts surrounding the omission, the IRS must decide that blaming her would not be fair.
The office manager is experiencing a difference in hierarchical behavior
Explanation:
In South Korean culture there is a tradition of hierarchy. According to this tradition the bosses are treated as superior and the people working under him are treated as subordinates. According to the South Korean the subordinates should be given the order what they have to do. On the other hand the other countries have different rules, that is they do their work to live. In American culture they can behave in any way they want to be.
It is a <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.
<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>
Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:
<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>
See the link below for more about Arbitration:
brainly.com/question/1139969
