This question is about the article "The Flight from Conversation" by Sherry Turkle.
Answer:
Turkle uses the allusion to strengthen the argument she made in the paragraph.
Explanation:
In paragraph 9, Turkle shows why communication via devices has become so popular in our society. She says that this success is because the devices allow us to have communication as far as we can control. This is because this communication is neither too much nor too little, but it is enough within the standards that we ourselves have established. To emphasize this argument, she uses the allusion to Goldilocks effectively, which explains the tendency of people to like things that are not so simple, but are not so complicated.
Lee will succeed in rewarding the child based on operant conditioning.
<h3>What is operant conditioning?</h3>
- It is a way of modeling a specific type of behavior.
- It is a way of rewarding positive behavior and punishing negative behavior.
In operant conditioning, the individual uses differential reinforcement, successive approximations, and punishments to shape behaviors.
Differential reinforcement refers to rewards for positive behaviors. In this case, Lee can encourage reading through successive approximations and reward his child whenever an effective reading is performed.
More information about operant conditioning is in the link:
brainly.com/question/7170975
Answer:
Explanation:
One should not care for another living being because of any intention. You care because you love, and you want to be there for them.
If you think caring more, or going the extra mile for someone makes you superior then you are trying to justify your actions because, may be, deep inside you don’t want to. But since you are still doing it, thinking you are superior makes this action acceptable in your own eyes.
Care as much as you want, but when you feel you need to find justification for your action, it might be time for you to pause and take a closer look at what you are doing is something that you really want to or not.
All the taskbar items and shortcuts from the start menu are unable to complete their links.
The phrase "the item you selected is unavailable it might have been moved, renamed, or removed. Do you want to remove it from the list".
The items have not been moved, nor renamed, nor removed. The list does update with recent items, but I can never get the short cut to work. I have tried to delete these shortcuts, but the "delete" does not delete them
Monica could not decide what she would wear is can be written in a noun clause and it will be She could not decide what she would wear. In the case above, Use of clause on the subject.
<h3>What is a noun clause?</h3>
A noun clause is known to be a kind of dependent clause that often collect or takes the place of any noun in any given sentence be it subjects, objects, or subject complements.
Monica could not decide what she would wear is can be written in a noun clause and it will be She could not decide what she would wear. In the case above, Use of clause on the subject.
Learn more about noun clause from
brainly.com/question/1258371
