1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bagirrra123 [75]
3 years ago
14

10. What was the main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution?

History
1 answer:
Evgen [1.6K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

Explanation:

The main argument used by Anti-Federalists in debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution is that "Individual rights would be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government."

This is evident as they eventually asked for the establishment of a Bill of Rights to serves as a means of protecting the Individual and states rights that may be threatened by the creation of a stronger federal government.

You might be interested in
Explain how the powers of the President have expanded over time. (change over time option)
hammer [34]

How much power should the president have? On one hand, a powerful executive permits quick and decisive action, which is important for responding to current events. On the other hand, if the president gets too powerful, Congress and the people may lack the ability to hold him or her accountable.

“The Executive Department Further Considered,” written by Alexander Hamilton. In this essay, Hamilton argues that a single executive (led by one person as president, rather than several people acting as a council) is the best form for the executive branch of the United States.

He reasons that one president can act more quickly, and with more secrecy when necessary, than a larger group of leaders. He also argues that a single executive is less dangerous to democracy than a council, because it is easier to identify and remove one corrupt person than to discover who among several leaders is a bad actor.

plz mark me as brainliest :)

7 0
3 years ago
Earthenware, stoneware, and bronze were common mediums used in________
cestrela7 [59]

The correct answer is:

Ancient China

Earthenware, stoneware, and bronze were materials commonly used in the Ancient China. This articles made from clay are also called Pottery. They began to use pots as articles where they could cook and eat their food. Stoneware's clay is fired at high temperatures of 1,200°C. Earthenware is fired at temperatures of  1,000 to 1,150 degrees. Which results in a more long lasting material, with a denser, stone-like quality.



4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a comparison of the ancient cities of athens and sparta, sparta placed more emphasis on.
Nikitich [7]

In a comparison of the ancient cities of Athens and Sparta, Sparta placed more emphasis on war.

<h3>How can ancient cities of Athens and Sparta, be compared?</h3>

Athens  are the one that shifted their focus  on culture, they are more concerned on the preservation of their culture compare to Sparta.

It should be noted that Sparta on the other hand  focus more on war, however the  oligarchy structure that is more seen in Sparta make them to be able to keep war as a top priority.

Learn more about Sparta on:

brainly.com/question/15909150

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
When was the Declaration of Independence finally signed?
andriy [413]

Answer:

August 2, 1776

Explanation:

Im smart

3 0
3 years ago
(HELP 31 points) 11. How did the rich people see Julius Caesar?
Alchen [17]

Answer: Well, as Caesar got older, his wealth increased exponentially. First when he was a soldier, he was very poor, although he was technically a patrician. Then, he climbed the rungs of the Senate ladder, from quaestor, to aedile, to praetor, and finally he became the consul of Rome. This is also when he became part of the First Triumvirate, along with Crassus and Pompey. Right now, he had gotten very rich, but was also deeply indebted. Then, he became a proconsul and went on to govern three prestigious provinces, Illyricum, Cisalpine Gaul and Transalpine Gaul. He became even more indebted as he raised a few legions at his own personal expense. But, when the Gallic Wars ended, Caesar was probably the richest Roman, due to the massive plunder and slaves he gained from this war. He got even more plunder, after turning Egypt into a client kingdom, defeating and plundering the Kingdom of Pontus, and defeating the Pompeians at Thapsus, Pharsalus and Munda. He gave each Roman soldier 100 talents of silver, and a plot of land in Roman territory, and also every Roman citizen 1 silver talent. This was like 10 years worth of wages. Still, he remained the richest Roman, and Octavian inherited this wealth, without which he would not have won against Mark Antony. Hopes this helps pls pls mark me as brainliest

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP WITH HISTORY PLEASE!! HELP
    11·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Why does the atmosphere get hotter with more carbon dioxide and methane in the air
    6·1 answer
  • Why does the CIA have more freedom of action than that of other federal agencies
    11·1 answer
  • Describe a “bureaucracy”
    8·1 answer
  • In the 1000s Christians in the east broke away from the rest of the church and
    10·1 answer
  • If different nations controlled the territory between the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean, how would life be different?
    12·1 answer
  • Globalization has the largest effect on
    9·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the event where king delivered his speech
    15·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!