Answer:
C. demonstrate that their interpretations are both accurate.
Explanation:
When drafting an argumentative essay, a historian denies possible counterclaims to answer to arguments that could scrutinize his or her argument.
An argumentative essay is a kind of essay that performs arguments about both parties of a problem.
Counterargument introduces to an argument which contradicts earlier arguments and make the original position more accurate.
The composition of an argumentative essays incorporates: foundation, body, counterargument and a summing-up.
Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
I think the answer is c because they defeated Philip in 197 BC at the battle of Cynoscephalae, and then he sued for peace.
Answer:
She saw that he was special and saw what he can do with his power through plebeian, and he gave money to her and etc.
He was undermining the roman republic and doing things without really thinking with his power.
Explanation:
