Answer:
I would go the longest trail.
Explanation:
I would go the longest because i am fat and need to exercise.
Answer:correct answer its A slavery was abolished
Explanation:The historical example demonstrates the necessity for being able to amend the U.S. Constitution. Though the original document would not seem compatible with the institution of slavery, in cultural context is was enforced unjustly, and required significant adjustments to ensure equity and freedom for all.
The depth to payments ratio or DTI is defined as the ratio of the total monthly bills to be paid to the monthly income of that particular person.
Explanation:
The DTI ratio can be calculated in four ways:
1. Make a note of all the payments you have to make every month and sum them up.
2. Calculate your income including your wages, dividends, freelance payments, and alimony.
3. Convert all the values to a monthly value.
For example: If your annual is $60000, the monthly income would be %5000. Carry on the same calculation for your debts also. Suppose your annual debt is $30000, then the monthly debts total is $2500.
4. Finally, divide the debt value by your income value and then multiply it by 100. We are multiplying by 100 to arrive at a percentage value.
For the above example your DTI will be $30000 divided by $60000 which equals to $0.5 x 100 = 50%
Answer:
The Boxer Rebellion was an uprising against foreigners that occurred in China about 1900, begun by peasants but eventually supported by the government. A Chinese secret society known as the Boxers embarked on a violent campaign to drive all foreigners from China. Several countries sent troops to halt the attacks.
Explanation:
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
