The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
B. I looked it up so I’m sorry if It is incorrect
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. He declared that the only hope for the Southeastern tribes' survival would be for them to give up all their land and move west of the Mississippi River. ... The U.S. government promised to compensate the tribes for the property they would have to abandon.
They probably played it because of the victory of the battle
I think it is C.) Brilliant architecture such as the Taj Mahal , whicg used domes decorated color tiles
