1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
3 years ago
12

1. What obstruction of justice crime primarily concerns the professional conduct of attorneys?

Law
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Proper professional conduct that is at odds with the legal profession's

Explanation:

Proper professional conduct that is at odds with the legal profession's

You might be interested in
The history of policing in the United States extends back to?
AfilCa [17]
The Americans revolution
6 0
4 years ago
Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?
GarryVolchara [31]
it states that the federal government laws are the supreme laws of the land and what the federal government can or cannot do, i believe
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1680, what religious group advocated that incarceration was a more humane punishment than
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

In 1680, the Quakers advocated that incarceration was a more humane punishment than corporal punishment.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

As used in these standards, “prosecutor” means any attorney, regardless of agency, title, or full or part-time assignment, who acts as an attorney to investigate or prosecute criminal cases or who provides legal advice regarding a criminal matter to government lawyers, agents, or offices participating in the investigation or prosecution of criminal cases. These Standards are intended to apply in any context in which a lawyer would reasonably understand that a criminal prosecution could result.

These Standards are intended to provide guidance for the professional conduct and performance of prosecutors. They are written and intended to be entirely consistent with the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, and are not intended to modify a prosecutor's obligations under applicable rules, statutes, or the constitution. They are aspirational or describe “best practices,” and are not intended to serve as the basis for the imposition of professional discipline, to create substantive or procedural rights for accused or convicted persons, to create a standard of care for civil liability, or to serve as a predicate for a motion to suppress evidence or dismiss a charge. For purposes of consistency, these Standards sometimes include language taken from the Model Rules of Professional Conduct; but the Standards often address conduct or provide details beyond that governed by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. No inconsistency is ever intended; and in any case a lawyer should always read and comply with the rules of professional conduct and other authorities that are binding in the specific jurisdiction or matter, including choice of law principles that may regulate the lawyer’s ethical conduct.

Because the Standards for Criminal Justice are aspirational, the words “should” or “should not” are used in these Standards, rather than mandatory phrases such as “shall” or “shall not,” to describe the conduct of lawyers that is expected or recommended under these Standards. The Standards are not intended to suggest any lesser standard of conduct than may be required by applicable mandatory rules, statutes, or other binding authorities.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition/ for more info

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How have the courts shaped the issue of student speech over time? Consider changes in
Marina86 [1]

Answer:

Courts have begun to make freedom of speech more restricted in public schools due to outside problems such as drugs, threats, and riots (represented in the cases Tinker V. Des Moines, Bethel V. Fraser, J.S v. Bethlehem area school district, and Morse V. Fredrick.) Due to these outbursts, courts have begun to restrict speech that is a distraction to the school and school staff.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Accredited jails tend to be safer for _____.
    6·2 answers
  • How does our Governor plan to close the achievement gap in education?
    14·2 answers
  • What is defensive driving?
    7·1 answer
  • What type of cases do State Courts normally hear?
    8·1 answer
  • A U.S. foreign ambassador in Kuwait leaked government secrets regarding the
    5·2 answers
  • You are a purchasing manager for a retailer of high-end kitchen products. You know that Malinox, Inc. Is the best manufacturer o
    6·1 answer
  • Generally, the recomputed adjusted basis of a repossessed residence is determined by the adjusted basis on the date of the _____
    5·1 answer
  • I need help please.
    10·1 answer
  • (HELP IM ON A TIMER, 3 MINUTES LEFT) What are some ways the House of Representatives turn a bill into a law after the president
    11·1 answer
  • According to the clear and present danger test, speech may be restricted.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!