1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
djverab [1.8K]
3 years ago
12

According to the clear and present danger test, speech may be restricted.

Law
1 answer:
Katarina [22]3 years ago
6 0

Clear and present danger test, says speech may be restricted if evidence exists that such expression would endanger the public.

<h3>What is a clear and present danger test?</h3>

The clear and present danger test stressed that

printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint.

Unless there is a danger created by that expression, this test was originated in Schenck v. the United States.

Learn more about clear and present danger test at;

brainly.com/question/24452126

You might be interested in
Assume that Big Drug Company (BDC) was one of ten drug manufacturers that produced and sold a drug in Ohio that was found to cau
n200080 [17]

Answer:

Market share liability

Explanation:

To understand the doctrine of market share liability, it is important to first know the meaning of market share itself.

Market share refers to the percentage of the overall sales of a particular industry that is generated by a company. It calculated by dividing the total sales of the firm during a specified period by the aggregate sales of the industry during the same period. This gives an idea what the size of a company is compared with its competitors in the industry.

From the question, market share of BDC for that drug i Ohio is believed to be 40% when the mother of the plaintiff was taking it.

Market share liability is a legal doctrine unique to the law of the U.S. which gives an opportunity to a plaintiff who sustained an injury from a fungible product to establish a prima facie case against the product based on the market share of the manufacturers of that product, regardless of whether or not knows the actual producer of the product.

Therefore, the state of the plaintiff follows the doctrine of market share liability if he is able to collect $40,000 which from BDC out of the $100,000.

Note:

The $40,000 is obtained after applying 40% market share of BDC to the $100,000 total damages.

I wish you the best.

8 0
4 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

Senate

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What are two features of the relationship between parliament and the courts, using examples
Andre45 [30]

Answer:

The Parliament and the courts are separate: Parliament makes statute laws, the courts interpret the law. The judiciary (courts) can also "make" law through interpretations and application of common law.

Explanation:

Courts and parliaments interact in the law-making process. They need to work together so that the law is flexible and can apply to any situation that might arise.

The courts are responsible for settling disputes. Many disputes are settled by the courts by interpreting the words in an Act of parliament. As a secondary role, the courts also occasionally make laws.Parliament is the supreme law-making body. This is also referred to as sovereignty of parliament. Parliament’s main role is to make laws. As a supreme law-making body, parliament can make laws that either confirm or reject laws made by courts, although the Commonwealth Parliament cannot override High Court interpretations of the Commonwealth Constitution. Courts depend on parliament to make the bulk of the law. Parliament depends on courts to apply the law made by parliament and to establish new law on situations that have arisen for the first time.

7 0
3 years ago
In conveyancing Law why is identity evidence required
ad-work [718]

Answer:

The other main reason that identity checks are required is to help prevent money laundering and mortgage fraud. Solicitors who fail to follow procedures to properly identify a client can unintentionally assist in the commission of financial crime, including the funding of terrorism.

8 0
3 years ago
Three own positions when dealing with gender based violence taking into account Bill Of Rights​
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

Between 25% and 40% of South African women have experienced sexual and/or physical IPV in their lifetime [9, 10]. Just under 50% of women report having ever experienced emotional or economic abuse at the hands of their intimate partners in their lifetime [10].

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    6·2 answers
  • A person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can also a file an appeal at which court
    15·1 answer
  • congress passed a federal law in 1970 that allowed 18 year olds to vote in national state and local elections. in a paragraph ex
    5·1 answer
  • Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations​
    6·2 answers
  • A non-custodial interrogation is not an option after the individual has
    6·1 answer
  • Who is the father of legal medicine in the Philippines?​
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following work towards
    15·1 answer
  • I need Help with This
    11·1 answer
  • Which is an example of an Institutional robbery?
    11·1 answer
  • When did campaign finance regulation begin in the United States?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!