If congress has a majority of one party that is opposite that of the president, then the president is probably more likely to veto bills from the legislature. An example of this is on February 24, 2015, President Obama vetoed the Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act.
The third one is your answer
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation attempt to balance the sovereignty of the states with an effective national government. The states had the power to tax. ... Power was concentrated in a single assembly rather than being divided as in the state governments into separate houses and branches
Explanation:
Make sure to re word it
I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.
In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.
