According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
Answer: Over-sized ego
Explanation:
Over-sized ego is defined as the property of having big ego in which a person tends to lose interpersonal skills and empathy.They believe their every thought and work is correct and do not base their opinions and views according to other people.They have the tendency to be right in everything as thinking of being superior than others .
According to the question, Tyrone is not able to communicate due to obstruction created by over-sized ego.He thinks of being superior after being promoted to manager position.This makes him ignore other opinion and instruction of boss.He thinks he is taking correct measure for handling project and others view and support are not important.
The Mayflower Compact was important for a number of reasons.
First, it kept mutiny at bay.
But it was also a good first step as the new colonists figured out what rules they wanted to live by.
By setting up a system with majority rule, they ensured that there would always be consensus for decisions and would ensure that everybody would win some and everybody would lose some. The system would feel fair as they faced tough years ahead.
