You get everything you need from factoring the last expression:
The left side is a difference of squares, and we get another difference of squares upon factoring. We end up with
Plug in everything you know and solve for 
:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- Translate P to E; rotate ∆PQR about E until Q is coincident with F; reflect ∆PQR across EF
- Reflect ∆PQR across line PR; translate R to G; rotate ∆PQR about G until P is coincident with E
Step-by-step explanation:
The orientations of the triangles are opposite, so a reflection is involved. The various segments are not at right angles to each other, so a rotation other than some multiple of 90° is involved. A translation is needed in order to align the vertices on top of one another.
The rotation is more easily defined if one of the ∆PQR vertices is already on top of its corresponding ∆EFG vertex, so that translation should precede the rotation. The reflection can come anywhere in the sequence.
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
The mapping can be done in two transformations: translate a ∆PQR vertex to its corresponding ∆EFG point; reflect across the line that bisects the angle made at that vertex by corresponding sides.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(7y)² = 7²×y² = 49y²
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply x/20 each side
Just plug in 3 for n and then 5 for n to see if an turns out to be 10 and 26.
n=3:
A) an = 8*3+10 = 34
B) an = 8*3 - 14 = 10 OK
C) an = 16*3+10 = 58
D) an = 16*3 - 38 = 10 OK
n=5:
B) an = 8*5-14 = 26 OK
D) an = 16*5 - 38 = 42
So the answer is B
