1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OleMash [197]
3 years ago
10

I will give brainliest to the best answer

History
2 answers:
LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
8 0
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.

Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.

Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
GalinKa [24]3 years ago
8 0
If were talking about ancient Greece then we could talk about how women couldnt vote in Greece. However thats just a starter answer.
You might be interested in
Which of the following government types would most likely have been supported by thomas hobbes
kati45 [8]
B. a  country is controlled by a king who has the absolute authority to make dicisions
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A government run by religious leaders
dybincka [34]

Answer: A theocracy

Theocracy: a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement most accurately describes the modern role of the U.S. Military as a tool of foreign policy? A. The U.S. Military
erica [24]

Answer:

B. Military force is an easy way to replace an unfriendly foreign leader

Explanation:

The US has been using its military way to often as a tool of its foreign policies in the past century. While it was understandable during the Cold War, after it ended it is simply absurd. It seems that whenever the US has problems with some leader of another country where it has some interest, it employs its military, attacks the country, and takes down the unwanted leader. While some may argue that the US military has acted as peacekeeper, society builder, bringing democracy, in practice it has been the total opposite, and we have Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria to witness for it, being left in ruins, total chaos, and becoming fertile grounds for terrorist basis.

8 0
4 years ago
Which European country invaded the Mossi states in the 19th century?
lidiya [134]

The answer is d. France.  The French invaded in Mossi states after taking over the surrounding territories.  This led to the French control of the region. The last king Wobgo retired and was awarded a pension by the British.  He died in 1904.

4 0
3 years ago
EXPLAIN USING EVIDENCE how the great depression may have led to WW1?!
Anni [7]
MAIN- Militerism, Alliance, Imperialism and Nationalism are the four aspects on which war starts. WW1 happens before the Great Depression so The Great Depression was the result of WW1. WW1 caused many economic problems that affected the civilians since they had to work harder and pay more so they could barely eat. Other countries were also affected as the country wasn’t producing more benefits. So the country couldn’t trade resulting in even more lost of money .
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What strategy did Carrie chapman Catt employ to promote women's suffrage?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end world was ll impact the United States Relationship wit
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the Chinese lose the Opium War? A. Chinese weapons were no match for British gunboats. B. Chinese troops mutinied. C. Ty
    11·1 answer
  • What immediate and long-term effects could you envision if rainfall and drinking water suddenly became unavailable in your state
    12·1 answer
  • After emancipation, ____were given the right to vote.<br> Blacks, or Women
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think interest groups should be allowed to influence government? Or do
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes this diagram?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
    11·1 answer
  • AYUDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Sino ang limang hari ng sinaunang roma​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!