Group of answer choices a small group of individuals exercises power but remains constitutionally responsible to the public non-democratic.
a small group of individuals exercises power over the state without being constitutionally responsible to the public
- This section first explains why a more thorough typology is required rather than a simple binary classification before outlining various nondemocratic regime types. Although it does not attempt to assess the relative efficacy of each type of regime discussed—doing so would necessitate a book unto itself—it does conclude with a sobering reminder of the numerous atrocities done by nondemocratic regimes that should never be overlooked.
- The goal of legitimization is to win the populace's active permission, compliance with the regime's regulations, passive obedience, toleration, or resignation. Legitimation presents at least two significant obstacles for the study of non-democratic regimes. The first criticism is that legitimation is only "window decoration." Accordingly, the autocracies' attempts to legitimize themselves lack substance since they are merely outward manifestations of the violence, coercion, or co-optation the regime is able to wield. Second, it is frequently asserted that the conceptual and methodological challenges involved in its analysis are insurmountable, even though it is widely acknowledged that legitimation is crucial to the continuation of non-democratic government. Understanding the goals, motivations, and consequences of non-democratic regimes makes these obstacles crucial to overcome Having stable legitimacy can shed light on several facets of autocratic rule.
To learn more about nondemocratic visit:brainly.com/question/474018
#SPJ4
Answer:When a large object impacts the surface of the Earth, the rock at the site of the impact is deformed and some of it is ejected into the atmosphere to eventually fall back to the surface. This results in a bowl shaped depression with a raised rim, called an Impact Crater.
Explanation:
What is art?
Can we apply our concept of art to art of the past?
Can we apply our concept of art to art of different cultures? Is there one correct standard for judging art?
Answer:
Predictive validity.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests with the Psychology Aptitude Test (PAT) scoring system; the predictive validity is a way of calculating how a determined score on a test predicts scores on a certain criterion measure. In other words, this is a correlation between tests and ratings; as shown in the example provided by the exercise: "Their scores were later compared to their performance in the introductory psychology course, and high scores on the PAT were related to high grades in the course".
A persuasive speech on a question of fact is essentially the same as an informative speech. False. A persuasive speech and an informative speech are still two completely different types of speeches. A persuasive speech is when you are trying to change the viewpoint of someone else to reflect one similar to yours or facts. An informative speech is solely presenting the information to someone else.
