The reason why the half-way covenant was created during the mid-1700
is because of the reason that it is a reminder of a religious foundation to the
New England Puritans. The close answer and similar one on the choices provided
above is letter D.
Answer:
Yes that is correct hope you got it
<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that in general expansion was not justifiable since the Mexicans and Natives were doing nothing to provoke the US. One could argue it was justifiable since Americans needed more land. </span>
Answer:
Let´s try to put it simple. The separation of powers system establishes the competencies, the actions, the prerrogatives, the domains where each branch of government can exercise their powers, different from those of other branches. For example, taxes are set by Congress, and the presidency´s job is to collect them. Interpretation of laws corresponds to the judiciary, not to the president nor Congress.
On the other hand, checks and balances create counterweights to a possible abuse of power by one branch, giving branches of government legal instruments to check, to restrain the actions of another branch. For example: the US administration negotiates and sign foreign treaties, but the Senate must ratify them. Sometimes, it has refused to approve a treaty as when the Senate did not ratify the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 as requested by president Woodrow Wilson.
Explanation:
The documents C and B may indeed be related to one another. So many invasions occurred. Another connection is that the soldiers abandoned their defense, which meant that they would not be able to repel the invaders.
- There is a correlation because losing protection would make it harder for the soldiers to defeat the invaders if there were several invasions.
- It's conceivable that Documents C and B are related because Document B claimed that because the soldiers were helpless and surrendered, fled and rendered their army hopeless, the adversaries would seize control and a populace invasion would fill the void. As a result, Document B serves as both a justification for Rome's demise and evidence in Document C, which also depicts the invasion.
- The two documents are related to one another. They are related since they both involve the military. The reasons why the military disintegrated are discussed in document B. The invasion of Rome by the six tribes is discussed in document C. If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack.
- This is due to the fact that documents B and C describe Rome's decline as a result of the invaders. It is explained in document B how the troops weakened themselves, and it is shown in document C together with a map of the empires that invaded Rome. My proof is found in B, where it states, "But when, due to carelessness and sloth, round drills were abandoned. This proof demonstrates the soldiers' slackness. Rome's invasions are depicted in C with lines, names, and dates. This proof provided me with the solution.
- Given that they both compare how Rome's army declined, Document C and Document B may be related to one another. I discovered this information by looking through Doc B's search results and then observing how many different nations had attacked Doc C. When these sources discuss how many different nations Rome's soldiers faced without armor, they are compared.
To learn more about document C and document B visit:brainly.com/question/27215505
#SPJ9
