Generally speaking, this exercising of the government's authority is called their "prerogative", since they can deem that this is necessary and "proper" in order to protect the US.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "the Enlightenment philosopher John Locke," since he was very much a proponent of popular sovereignty and the social contract. </span></span>
Answer: In a way, yes
Explanation:
The Cold War was a period of extreme tension for both countries involved, for they were on the constant lookout for each other’s actions and decisions. Fear of a nuclear attack seeped into the nation with ease and this caused people to live in constant anxiety, for no one really knew when and if war would break out. Freedom and liberty can be presented in many ways, and in this case, people’s freedom from fear and anxiousness was taken away. The government had to keep constant monitoring and this also took away privacy, so that’s a lil extra to it.
Answer:
<h3>In a perfect free enterprise system, there would be no government involvement in the economy. This means the government would have no say in where people buy goods/resources, they would not tell business how much product to make, and they would not tell businesses how much to charge for services</h3>
<h2>Hope it's helpful....!!</h2>
<h2>pls mark me in brainlist</h2>
