Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. The remaining part of the question reads;
the first paragraph;
<em>I spent my teens and much of my twenties collecting printed rejections. Early on, my mother lost $61.20—a reading fee charged by a so-called agent to look at one of my unpublished stories. No one had told us that agents weren’t supposed to get any money upfront, weren’t supposed to be paid until they sold your work. Then they were to take ten percent of whatever the work earned. Ignorance is expensive. That $61.20 was more money back then than my mother paid for a month’s rent.</em>
The last sentence of the first paragraph (“That . . . month’s rent”) primarily serves to
A. <em>justify an action by invoking an ethical principle</em>
B. clarify a point by defining an ambiguous term
C. show how anecdotal evidence supports a claim
<em>D. provide meaningful context for a revealing statistic</em>
<em>E. demonstrate that a common practice has harmful effect</em>
Answer:
<u><em>D. provide a meaningful context for a revealing statistic</em></u>
Explanation:
By saying, "<em>That $61.20 was more money back then than my mother paid for a month’s rent" </em>the narrator had revealed a very interesting statistic about the value of money back then.
In other words, the context surrounding the statement helps the average reader quickly understand that a month's rent used to be <em>lesser</em> than $61.20; very interesting statistics at that.
Answer:
<h3> relative triviality of the speaker's situation.</h3>
Explanation:
- In the poem 'Giving Back the Flower", the poet tries question the cruel fate of her lover who dies in the battle field. She tries to portray the negative effects of war and conflict in her poem.
- The speaker's description of herself as 'a women in jewels and lace' and the description of 'children crying for bread' serves to emphasize the relative triviality of the speaker's situation.
- She wants the readers to understand that there are much more bigger problems in this world than her own. She compares her problems with that of the hungry children and realizes that her problems and situation is relatively trivial than theirs.
Explanation:
Some countries that were originally on the list of developing countries such as China, Brazil, India are now considered as developed countries, including Indonesia and South Africa
make me branliest answer
please
Answer:
I guess the application method by hands is more harmful. As pesticides are some sort of chemical substances which are used to kill insects and other sort of pests in any kind of plant. And we also know that pesticides are chemical substances.So when pesticides are typically applied by hands it can damage your palm skin.After applying pesticides you wash your hands. But, Do you know that even after washing little amount of pesticides are left on your palm?? And by using that hands you cook food then eat it. Then, you will fall sick as well as your family members. So, isn't it harmful to apply pesticides by using your hands??
Interesting
the question please?
