C is correct
The northern states did not want all the slaves to be counted towards the population as it can take away representation from the north because south has a greater number of slaves’ population and south can take advantage of having more representation. However north attempted several times to shift away the burden of taxation.
Online shopping has been influenced by the increased availability of <u>smartphones.</u>
<u></u>
<h3><u>What exactly is purchasing online?</u></h3>
Online shopping is a type of electronic commerce that enables customers to make direct purchases from sellers over the Internet using a web browser or a mobile application. Customers can find an item of interest by going to the retailer's website directly or by utilizing a shopping search engine to look for other vendors.
Shopping search engines show customers the availability and cost of an item at other online merchants. Customers will be able to purchase online by 2020 by utilizing a variety of computers and gadgets, such as desktop and laptop computers, tablets, cellphones, and laptops.
<u></u>
Learn more about online shopping with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/13765445
#SPJ4
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
To disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.
