Biden would offer superior leadership.
Biden has spent almost his entire adult life in elective office, and in his Senate career acquired a reputation as a dealmaker and foreign policy expert. He is a supporter of common-sense gun control and environmental protections. He listens to the advice of scientists on matters of public health. As vice president under Barack Obama, he managed the 2009 economic recovery package — an experience that, sadly, will be relevant in 2021. His victory in the Democratic primaries was built on support from Black voters, demonstrating an ability to build coalitions across racial lines that will be of critical importance in a starkly divided nation that must address the sins of its past. Biden has already made history by choosing as his running mate Senator Kamala Harris, a fierce defender of civil rights and LGBTQ rights and the nation’s first Black and Asian-American woman to be a major party’s vice presidential nominee. Biden has the chance to be a transformative president, expanding health care access, preventing climate catastrophe and cleaning up our air and water, and protecting voting rights. But Joe Biden doesn’t need Congress at all for the most important job before him: to make the presidency great again.
Answer:
El derecho consuetudinario son las normas relativas a la costumbre o tradición de una comunidad. Es una fuente de derecho subsidiaria de los derechos positivos. ... Ejemplo de ello son, el derecho civil, el penal, el laboral etc. Y el derecho consuetudinario es el antónimo de este derecho positivo.
Explanation:
Answer:
you should paraphrase
Explanation:
Before the Bill of Rights, people could be suspected and accused of a crime without determining whether is was true. Not everyone had a right to a trial where they could defend themselves or be defended by a lawyer before they were punished. The Bill of Rights has influenced the coined phrase "Innocent until proven guilty." It also allows people who believe their trial was unfair to request a new one so they can be fairly judged.
Answer: The person testifying is the defendant in a criminal case: This is an extension of the protection under the Fifth Amendment. Criminal defendants can never be forced to testify. The witness is married to someone involved in the case: Communication between two spouses is considered privileged by courts.
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Given set data base has every new born child's DNA towards every passing of every other. Not meaning habing a crimjnal record puts blood and suliva but preamble DNA from birth, now rather than having to point match on criminal data, rather pre-set DNA data base on every human living or non-living.
Properly deviding DNA base still into split sections for criminal records amd clean records where clean record's are rather added/stamped when found guilty in the court of law, but then having all possible DNA sample at the touch of a button (rather should i say match) pre-liminates playing detective and running around following leads, ensuring closure towards deceased members familiy and aswell as eliminating wrongful imprisonment of non guilty members that adds unnecessary cost and reclurces towrards goverment funds etc.
Having "system that works, why fix" is not as having a system that continuously improves and sustains a flawless lrocedure rather than groping at the mids of a cold case in the hope that somewhere a light switch gets turned or a whistleblower apears is high waist of reacources and complete over kill. Given we are in a modern time where tech constantly improves to ease the human race, why not sustain a even rise in our modern living standards and consecutive growth in a that's even the slightest of possibilities.
